Social media share
Always free to use and ready to help you right away. But we need your help. Please consider sharing on social media with people in same interest. Get new members who share and value your membership and site.
Server statistics
Current Load: 0.44
Load 5 mins ago: 0.24
Load 15 mins ago: 0.18
Uptime: 84 days, 20h34m
System: Debian GNU/Linux

Your ISP monitors what you download, they can throttle connection speeds. You can use quality VPN connection to be anonymous and get back your connection speeds.
Advertising area
referral link
Useful information

Sktorrent.org is private torrent website which also accepts external torrents. includes forum. Registered members can upload, edit, delete own torrents. You should read the rules before doing anything else.

Announcements & rules > Broke Again, Dotcom Asks Hong Kong Court

You are in:  Torrent Forums / Announcements & rules / Broke Again, Dotcom Asks Hong Kong Court

Discuss about

torrent trackers

or

torrents in general

. Know something that we don't?

Share & discuss

it here!
Locked
DeluserPosted at 21:34:55 05.12.2015(417 wks ago)
Deleted Account


Uploaded: ---
Downloaded: ---
Posts: 2
Ratio: ---
Location:


Broke Again, Dotcom Asks Hong Kong Court For Millions
Lawyers for Kim Dotcom have asked a Hong Kong court for the release of millions in previously seized funds claiming that their client is broke once again. However, the prosecution claim that after opening new businesses, Dotcom banked "hundreds of millions" of dollars through Hong Kong.
In 2012, as Megaupload’s servers were being closed down in the U.S. and Dotcom’s New Zealand mansion was being raided by armed police, the entrepreneur’s offices in Hong Kong were being turned over by a reported 100 customs officers.

Under instruction from the U.S. government, HK$330 million (US$42.57m) in assets were seized and have remained restrained in Hong Kong ever since.

In April 2014, Megaupload launched legal action against the Hong Kong government, applying for the restraining order to be set aside while accusing the secretary for justice of procedural failings when the application for seizure was made.

In December 2014 came a breakthrough when a judge in the High Court set aside the restraining order. However, while an almost immediately lock was reapplied to Dotcom’s assets, a revised order granted Dotcom’s legal team the right to contest the asset freeze.

As part of that ongoing process, Dotcom’s lawyers were back in court this week asking for the release of large amounts of funds, the equivalent of US$2.3m to cover legal costs plus US$52,000 per month for his living expenses.

In keeping with argument presented at his recent extradition hearing in New Zealand, Dotcom’s legal team told the Hong Kong court that by restraining his funds and expecting him to mount a defense their client’s hands “were tied behind his back.”

SCMP reports that while Dotcom had a “world-class” legal team in the New Zealand hearing, he had no money left to pay them so had to use “junior lawyers.” Money had now run out in New Zealand, so the funds in Hong Kong were the next best option.

But just like last year when Hong Kong authorities were accused by Dotcom’s team of not making a “full disclosure” of the facts, this week the authorities sought to turn the tables.

Representing the government, prosecutor Wayne Walsh SC claimed Dotcom did the same after starting two new businesses and running transactions “worth hundreds of millions of dollars” through Hong Kong bank accounts. Dotcom was also criticized for not disclosing details of his living costs

Once a staunch supporter of Hong Kong, Dotcom now finds himself at the mercy of the country’s judges who to date have been much less flexible than their counterparts in New Zealand when it comes to releasing funds.

Back in May a New Zealand court released millions in funds to pay for Dotcom’s legal bills, plus $128K per month in living expenses.

A sizable $60K of that money was earmarked to pay the rent on Dotcom’s mansion, which has been reported to cost around $750,000 per annum under a lease signed in February 2013.

However, the terms of the agreement meant that Dotcom would ultimately have to buy the property or move out. It was reported in November that the entrepreneur would be moving to a waterfront penthouse apartment on “fashionable” Princes Wharf instead.

“It’s significantly more humble than what I am used to but that’s okay,” Dotcom said last month. “I am also not living with a partner any more, we have reduced our staff numbers significantly and this place feels a little bit big now.”

Report This Post Go to the top of the page
 
DeluserPosted at 09:40:39 08.02.2016(408 wks ago)
Deleted Account


Uploaded: ---
Downloaded: ---
Posts: 3
Ratio: ---
Location:


thanks for the update dear :)

Report This Post Go to the top of the page
 

<< Prev  1   Next >>

Locked
You are not permitted to post in this forum.
Login panel
Username
Password
Signups are open
Advertising area